Skip to main content
Global capability centres · Hyderabad

IT services for global capability centres in Hyderabad

Hyderabad is one of India's largest global capability centre destinations, with the biggest campuses at Raidurg, the Financial District and Nanakramguda, and newer occupiers filling Kokapet. The defining characteristic is that the standard is set elsewhere: a parent company in another country decides the security baseline, and the local site has to meet and evidence it.

The systems GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams actually run

Support only works if the provider knows what is on the network. This is the stack we expect to find, and the one we scope against.

  • Identity federated with the parent tenant, often with local exceptions
  • Endpoint management to a globally mandated configuration
  • Secure access to parent-company applications and data
  • Local collaboration and meeting-room technology at scale
  • Follow-the-sun service desk handovers across time zones
  • Local network and connectivity, usually the one layer owned on site

What constrains IT decisions in global capability centres

The parent sets the standard
Security baselines, tooling and reporting are mandated from the group. The local requirement is to meet them and prove it, not to design an alternative.
Group and local audit
Sites are audited by the parent as well as any external assessor. Evidence has to be produced on request, in the group's format.
Time-zone overlap
Handovers and overlap windows mean the local working day extends well past office hours, and support has to reflect that.

What we find going wrong

These are the recurring failures across the global capability centres estates we have taken on. If several of them are familiar, the pattern is more common than it feels.

  • Gaps and overlaps between the group IT function and local providers, where each assumes the other owns a system
  • Local exceptions to the global baseline that were granted informally and never reviewed
  • Escalation paths that work in local office hours and quietly do not during the overlap window
  • Meeting-room technology failing at scale, which is disproportionately visible to the parent
  • Local network treated as out of scope by group IT and unowned by anyone else

How we deal with each of those

Gaps and overlaps between the group IT function and local providers, where each assumes the other owns a system. We find it during the audit and fix it before it becomes an incident, rather than discovering it in a post-mortem. For GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams that matters because the parent sets the standard leaves very little room when gaps and overlaps between the group IT function and local providers is the thing that fails.

Local exceptions to the global baseline that were granted informally and never reviewed. It goes into the monitored baseline, so the failure is caught by an alert instead of by a user. For GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams that matters because group and local audit leaves very little room when local exceptions to the global baseline that were granted informally and never reviewed is the thing that fails.

Escalation paths that work in local office hours and quietly do not during the overlap window. We remediate it and then document the control, so it can be evidenced rather than asserted. For GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams that matters because time-zone overlap leaves very little room when escalation paths that work in local office hours and quietly do not during the overlap window is the thing that fails.

Meeting-room technology failing at scale, which is disproportionately visible to the parent. It becomes a scheduled, owned task under the contract rather than nobody in particular being responsible for it. For GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams that matters because the parent sets the standard leaves very little room when meeting-room technology failing at scale is the thing that fails.

Local network treated as out of scope by group IT and unowned by anyone else. We design it out, because responding to the same fault repeatedly costs more than fixing the cause once. For GCCs, captive centres and offshore delivery teams that matters because group and local audit leaves very little room when local network treated as out of scope by group IT and unowned by anyone else is the thing that fails.

What the first weeks look like

The first deliverable is a written responsibility split between group IT, any incumbent provider and us, because the failures in a GCC almost always happen at a boundary nobody owned. Once that is agreed we take genuine ownership of the local layer, network, connectivity, meeting rooms and on-site hands, and configure the estate to the parent baseline with reporting in the format the group actually asks for.

Nothing is quoted from a rate card. We audit the estate, tell you plainly what we found, and price the work the audit justifies. If part of it is not worth doing, we say so at the quoting stage rather than after you have paid for it.

Scope

What we deliver for global capability centres

Scoped from a site audit, not a rate card. Anything outside the agreed scope is quoted before we start.
A written responsibility split
Documented agreement on which systems group IT owns, which we own, and what happens at the boundary.
Baseline conformance and evidence
Local estate configured to the group standard, with reporting in the format the parent asks for.
Local infrastructure ownership
Network, connectivity, meeting rooms and physical infrastructure genuinely owned rather than assumed.
Overlap-window support
Cover aligned to your actual working pattern, including the hours that overlap with the parent.
Reliable meeting rooms
Room technology monitored and maintained proactively, because a failed call with head office is the most visible failure a GCC has.
Onboarding at hiring pace
Provisioning that keeps up with headcount growth, so new joiners are productive on day one.

When we can touch your systems

Planned around your overlap hours and the group change calendar, so local work does not collide with a global change freeze.

Managed clients have a 30-minute response target for critical issues. For a first enquiry, we reply within 4 business hours.

Questions

IT for global capability centres, answered

Where you are

Global capability centres across Hyderabad

Areas where this sector concentrates, and where we already work.

What you probably need

Services that fit global capability centres

The parts of what we do that this sector buys most often.

Global capability centres, Hyderabad

Get a fixed-scope quote for global capability centres

Tell us what you run and where, and we will come back within 4 business hours. Managed clients get a 30-minute response SLA.